Hillary Wants War
This already has 2 million views; but it could always use a few more:
It is an absolute riot; but it is also spot on, devastating, thought-provoking, and rather persuasive. Especially for those uninterested in starting WWIII, and filling memorial graveyards with female draftees. I do hope the kids are considering such things. It could make a difference. Of course, we will have to wait for his next offering on Trump. 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
I think Hillary might have some trouble sleeping tonight. She’s having a very busy day today. Somebody got to Comey. He’s gotta be sweating bullets.
I wonder if they can get her arrested, convicted, sentenced and comfy in a jail cell so Obama can pardon her before he leaves office … LOL
I don’t really care, as long as Obama leaves office and Hillary doesn’t take his place. If she went to jail, she would just end up in a hospital ward anyway. Between her Parkinson’s and the DT’s from being denied alcohol, she would be a mess. Let Web Hubble’s daughter take care of her in her dotage. We have fed her long enough. 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
Yet I can think of no less objectionable expenditure of my tax dollars than to keep her in a lifestyle that she is most unaccustomed too. The rest of her life in an orange jump suit in the disgrace she richly deserves along with a majority of her cohorts. Few deserve it more, and I see no harm in investing in simple pleasures.
Good point. I particularly like the idea of her sharing a cell block with her cohorts. I suspect she wouldn’t have a friend among them, as a powerless and penniless old hag. 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
Unaccustomed to? She loves her orange pantsuit.
Well they can do that in an adjoining cell block can’t they? 😉
Hoo boy! Can’t make this stuff up. This is really getting to be fun. Sadly I have to issue another language warning but this is gold. He’s as crazy as he looks. https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=X5eQSH-LfzI
Surely that is a joke/spoof… It sounded like Mel Gibson’s meltdown a few years ago??? â—„Daveâ–º
Could very well be. I’m not going to listen to Gibsons whole rant to find the clip. It’s quite extensive and I have little tolerance for people of that sort. Believe none of what you hear and only half of what you see. That’s where we are at. The fact it’s out there at all shows where we have landed.
That’s exactly what it is. Snopes already pegged this one as Mel.
I suspect this sort of thing is being used to data mine social media for who has what ideology, who their trusted sources are, and how gullible they are. It’s very effective. I debunked one the other day that was supposedly a picture of a huge Standing Rock protest, but was actually a picture of Woodstock. All it took was a close look to see that not a single car in the picture was less than 50 years old, and the film color wasn’t modern, but confirmation bias is a bitch.
I expect to see some crazy stuff right before the election. I doubt whoever is doing this is just screwing around. After seeing how they operate, I see political campaign fingerprints all over these things.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26314
This video? Must be a fake.
Kaine having a mistress? … that would not surprise me. How many of those totally devout Christians have women on the side?
Look at Bill Clinton … NO ONE CARED! 🙂
As he stands doing nothing he comes off as a “dopey wingnut”.
More likely a toy-boy. To me, he comes off as a total twink. 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
Thanks Dave that is my laugh of the day!! 😉
Who is the mole in Hillary’s camp? Who in their right mind would have sent this tweet on her account?
Who would not find Trump’s quote totally reasonable, and how many would bother to read the message below the pic? It sure looks like sabotage to me. You? â—„Daveâ–º
She said this in the debate:
“This is a man” …, “who has said that women don’t deserve equal pay unless they do as good a job as men”
If you’ve read her campaign’s emails, you know that not only was this not a mistake, it probably took a whole team all day to craft that line. Everything she says these days is carefully scripted and regurgitated, and none of it comes from honest outrage.
I think this was meant as some gotcha phrase where if he went for it, she had some prepped line of high-horse/faux-outrage counterattack that would take the headlines. Since he didn’t bite, she may be rolling it out again for him. At this point, it just sounds ridiculous. I can’t wait to find out why I’m a bigot now for approving of paying people based on job performance.
No, I haven’t seen any of her campaign emails, so I am unaccustomed to such ridiculous rhetoric. I suppose that having a serviceable mind, usually employed in critical thinking, further inhibits my ability to tune into the degenerate Progressive mindset. Sheeple-speak is just beyond my ken. 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
I like strategy games, and I’ve done my share of marketing. That’s all it is, really. You don’t have the think like a sheep to herd them, you just have to have to have some grasp of what spooks them and which way the herd will face. Scott Adams knows what I’m talking about.
Here’s a quick summary of the more damning stuff in her emails, but you have to read a few to get a feel for the culture behind them.
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/
It got quiet here. I can only assume that it’s due to the daily jaw drops that need to be digested. Once done another one hits. Either mass corruption and graft will become the “new normal” of there will be a lot of crying. My money is on corruption.
Conformation bias abounds, Chris. Evidence that the Clinton’s are corrupt, is about as unsurprising as evidence that Trump likes hot women. Such things were already politically “normal” to my anarchist’s mind. 😉
For me, the election is already over. If Trump doesn’t win in a landslide, it will obviously be because of voter fraud, or that more ignorant sheeple than expected were somehow motivated to go vote for the Progressive team. In any case, Trump has already accomplished more carnage among the powers-that-be, than I could have possibly hoped for, when he threw his red hat into the ring.
What I am finding interesting at the moment, is speculation regarding what happens after the election, no matter which avowed statist is declared the winner. Another recession/depression is pretty much unavoidable in the near future. The uneasy talk about the risks of sparking WWIII is also certainly worth contemplating.
Most disconcerting, with the greatest potenital to affect my own life, is the likelihood that the anger in aftermath of the election, will evolve into another bloody revolution/civil war (same thing) in America. I have a blog post about this brewing in my mind; but in the meantime, you might find “6 Reasons Why A New Civil War Is Possible And Terrifying” thought provoking. 😯 â—„Daveâ–º
I don’t see how Hillary can lose. She’s got the media, the banks, insurance companies, foreign interests, google, facebook, the guy who makes the voting machines, and both national committees on her side.
That said, I think she’s going to find it hard to govern after all her dirty laundry has been hanging out in plain sight for so long.
All those advantages are why it is even close, Steel. Even then, it is the Progressive agenda that attracts these allies, certainly not Hillary’s persona. The same could be said about the populist political agenda, of most of Trump’s supporters.
Again, as an anarchist, I am somewhat encouraged to think that there won’t be a lot of actual ‘governing’ going on, regardless of the outcome of the statist oligarch’s sham election. Do read the article I referenced above… 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
Any thoughts? Steve Pieczenik was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and James Baker.
https://youtu.be/ov5kvWSz5LM
Google him, Chris. He has been peddling apocalyptic scenarios to Alex Jones for a lot of years now, and so far none of it has materialized. I first saw that several days ago, and it has not caught on anywhere beyond the conspiracy oriented sites. Color me skeptical… 🙁 â—„Daveâ–º
That’s what I was wondering. I hadn’t heard about him before most likely because of what you say. He’s from the Alex Jones side of the tracks. I pay little attention to him or those like him. Still I can’t help but be curious about how many things are coming to light. Particularly the “Wikileaks” revelations. The depth and volume of information is troubling. Taking for granted that it’s true. Thing is you never hear any dispute regarding the actual content. Only the source. I don’t see it as an outside force like the Russians. Somebody on the inside is responsible. Either it’s something very big or the American people are being played even bigger. Which still would take something very big. Thing is somebody is working very hard to upset the US apple cart. Not knowing who that somebody is puts us at a great disadvantage. The end game stays a blur. Couple that with the constant undermining of the electoral system that will cause whoever loses to not accept the “peaceful transfer of power” that has been the norm since founding and it’s a powder keg. One that nobody wishing to just be left alone will be able to avoid. I see nobody winning on Tuesday.
I don’t doubt at all that frustrated inside ‘deep state’ forces are feeding Wikileaks. I just don’t see this guy as their spokesman, or why they would even wish to formally publicize their activities. If I were they, and for some reason desired to formally threaten the Clinton/Obama cartel, I would simply put on an ‘Anonymous’ mask, and make a YouTube video. Wouldn’t that be far more effective and intimidating than Pieczenik? â—„Daveâ–º
The “Anonymous” part is what’s most concerning. I give them less weight than Wikileaks. At least there is a face there.
I understand what you are saying, Chris; but my point was that if, for some inexplicable reason, the rogue FBI agents or whatever, wished to publicly announce their vendetta to the cartel, why give them an identifiable target, with a dubious reputation? Which announcer would be the more likely to get their attention, and give them pause? Pieczenik or Anonymous? â—„Daveâ–º
Not arguing your point Dave, and certainly not arguing for the validity of Pieczniks claims. It’s the fact that we don’t actually know that’s disturbing. Information can’t be verified even on the credibility of the source any more. There are thousands of unheard of websites pumping out claims left and right. Every article is “explosive” and the end of one party or the other. You can chalk 90% of them up to click bait yet people are getting unhinged over it. They now have Hillary running a pedophile sex operation, Practicing satanism, and participating in some sort of dark style cooking with blood and urine or something. (I couldn’t even bother reading much of that) Ok, is Hillary bad? Hell yea. Is she as bad as that? Not likely.
As amusing as it all is, it’s unsettling to see people hanging on every load of crap posted out there. That’s why I don’t bother posting anything any more. My thoughts are way too boring. 🙂
LOL… me too. 😉
As far as I can tell, nobody has ever found a Wikileak to be a hoax, or modified from the original. You won’t find their victims denying their veracity, only challenging the source. As if it mattered, or somehow mitigated the guilt, if Russia were the source of the hacked files. I have decided that they are generally credible. The question is, are they being interpreted accurately. Does ‘hotdog’ really mean ‘boy,’ and is ‘pizza’ code for ‘girl,’ in pedophile speak? Reportedly, there are online sources that claim they do…
The satanic stuff is just totally bizarre. The thing is, it is real; but I’ve seen nothing actually tying it to Hillary, only Podesta and his brother. I’ll give you a good link to read about it. You will want to follow it, just to see a pic of Cassandra – the blog’s author is a total babe! 😉 â—„Daveâ–º
Just when you thought you knew weird it takes itself to a whole new level.
Submitted for your amusement. I took some creative time with windows paint. I find I’m not done with Bill and Hill. http://tspeak.us/clintons-cash-pay-play/